Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Inauguration Speech-OBAMA


Text of President Barack Obama's inaugural address
By The Associated Press

The Associated Press Tue Jan 20, 5:04 pm ET

Text of President Barack Obama's inaugural address on Tuesday, as delivered.
(44th President of the United States of America)

OBAMA: My fellow citizens:

I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because we the people have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebears, and true to our founding documents.

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly; our schools fail too many; and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land — a nagging fear that America's decline is inevitable, and that the next generation must lower its sights.

Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real. They are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America — they will be met.

On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the faint-hearted — for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things — some celebrated but more often men and women obscure in their labor, who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life.

For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West; endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

For us, they fought and died, in places like Concord and Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sanh.

Time and again these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions; greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.

This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions — that time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America.

For everywhere we look, there is work to be done. The state of the economy calls for action, bold and swift, and we will act — not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its cost. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. All this we will do.

Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions — who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their memories are short. For they have forgotten what this country has already done; what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose, and necessity to courage.

What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them — that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works — whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. Those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to account — to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day — because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.

Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control — and that a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on our ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart — not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good.

As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our founding fathers ... our found fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake. And so to all the other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born: know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are ready to lead once more.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the keepers of this legacy. Guided by these principles once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort — even greater cooperation and understanding between nations. We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people, and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we will work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat, and roll back the specter of a warming planet. We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense, and for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West — know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to the suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains. They have something to tell us, just as the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages. We honor them not only because they are guardians of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service; a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves. And yet, at this moment — a moment that will define a generation — it is precisely this spirit that must inhabit us all.

For as much as government can do and must do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people upon which this nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job which sees us through our darkest hours. It is the firefighter's courage to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parent's willingness to nurture a child, that finally decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends — hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism — these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility — a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship.

This is the source of our confidence — the knowledge that God calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny.

This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed — why men and women and children of every race and every faith can join in celebration across this magnificent Mall, and why a man whose father less than sixty years ago might not have been served at a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath.

So let us mark this day with remembrance, of who we are and how far we have traveled. In the year of America's birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by dying campfires on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At a moment when the outcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered these words be read to the people:

"Let it be told to the future world ... that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive...that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet (it)."

America, in the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what storms may come. Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God's grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

UN-Bangladesh Election



http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-11-01-3393911705_x.htm

USA TODAY

UN chief hopes for free, fair polls in Bangladesh

By Julhas Alam, Associated Press Writer

DHAKA, Bangladesh — U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Saturday he hopes Bangladesh can make a peaceful transition to democracy through free and fair elections due in December.

Bangladesh's military-backed interim government imposed a state of emergency in the South Asian nation in January 2007 following weeks of deadly rioting between supporters of rival political parties about electoral reform.

The country's main political parties have raised concerns that the Dec. 18 general election may not be free and fair if the government does not lift the emergency rule, under which political gatherings are banned and the military can make arrests without warrants. The government has not indicated if it intends to relax the restrictions.

Ban, who arrived in the Bangladeshi capital Dhaka on Saturday for a two-day visit, said he expected the government and political parties to cooperate to ensure an effective and violence-free election.

"I've expressed my sincere hope and wish that this parliamentary election will be held in the most fair, objective and credible way so that Bangladesh can have a very smooth and peaceful transition to full democracy," Ban told reporters after a meeting with an adviser to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Under the regime of former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia, opposition parties had complained the voter lists contained errors and duplications that favored her party. The U.N. has since provided technical assistance and funding for a scheme to clean up the lists. The new lists have been accepted by the country's main political parties.

Ban is expected to meet Bangladesh's figurehead President Iajuddin Ahmed and interim leader Fakhruddin Ahmed on Sunday along with delegations from the country's two major parties -- the Bangladesh Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party.

The U.N. said Ban will also visit some U.N.-sponsored climate change adaptation schemes in northern Bangladesh, which faces floods almost every year.

Bangladesh contributes more than 9,000 troops to U.N. peacekeeping missions worldwide, making it the second largest contributor of forces after Pakistan.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Bangladesh vote-2008


http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?from=rss_World&set_id=1&click_id=3&art_id=nw20081229055630718C251084


Independent Online-IOL

December 29 2008 at 07:12AM

BANGLADESH VOTES UNDER HEAVY SECURITY

By Julhas Alam
Associated Press Writer

Dhaka, Bangladesh - Bangladeshis formed long lines at polling stations even before voting began on Monday to choose a new prime minister and restore democracy after two years of emergency rule in the country's first election in seven years.

Authorities deployed 650 000 security forces across the country to prevent violence and vote fraud in the election, seen as crucial to restoring democracy in Muslim-majority Bangladesh, which has a history of military rule and political unrest.

But both of the leading candidates - former prime ministers Khaleda Zia and Sheikh Hasina - are facing corruption charges and many fear the election won't bring the reform the impoverished country of 150-million desperately needs.

The two have traded power back and forth for 15 years in successive governments marked by corruption, mismanagement and paralysing protests.

SA Quader, a 57-year-old businessman, was among about 500 voters who arrived a polling station in the capital's northern Uttara district at least an hour before it opened.

"I'm here to choose the right person to lead our country," Quader said.

"I'm confident the election will be free and fair."

There were concerns that the polls might degenerate into violence as the last attempt at elections in 2007 did.

That vote was preceded by weeks of deadly rioting between the Zia and Hasina's rival parties that prompted the military to cancel the election and declare emergency rule.

Clashes broke out Saturday between supporters of the candidates, leaving 85 people injured in three different districts, the United News of Bangladesh reported, quoting police and witnesses.

There was no reported violence Monday.

Fakhruddin Ahmed, the head of the interim government that took power when election were cancelled last year, promised that this time the vote would go ahead as scheduled.

"All along I have spoken about holding a free, fair and credible election, and that election is going to be held on Tuesday," Ahmed said on Sunday. He lifted the state of emergency earlier in December.

Zia and Hasina have traded power several times. Zia was elected prime minister in 1991, Hasina in 1996, and Zia again in 2001.

During the back and forth, a well-worn pattern emerged: One party wins the election, and the other spends the term leading strikes and protests to make impoverished nation of 150-million ungovernable.

In 2007, both Zia and Hasina were jailed on corruption charges, which they dismissed as politically motivated. They were freed on bail and re-assumed positions as the heads of their respective parties, the two largest in the country.

In northwestern Chapainawabganj town, there were more women then men who stood in line to vote.

"I've come here half an hour before the polling began. There are already 200 women standing in lines," said Tashkina Yeasmin, a local resident. "I don't mind waiting."

Women in this largely conservative, male-dominated country see voting as a rare opportunity to wield power.

"This is one of the rare occasion when we can make our own decision," said Yeasmin. - Sapa-AP

Quickwire

Published on the Web by IOL on 2008-12-29 05:56:30
© Independent Online 2005. All rights reserved. IOL publishes this article in good faith but is not liable for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information it contains.

Election 2008

The Canadian Press

Former prime minister Hasina wins Bangladesh's 1st election in 7 years

By Julhas Alam

Associated Press Writer

DHAKA, Bangladesh - Bangladeshi voters handed the alliance led by former prime minister Sheikh Hasina a landslide victory in results announced Tuesday, as the troubled South Asian country returned to democracy after two years of military-backed rule.

The voting Monday was the most peaceful in decades - a stark contrast to the failed elections of 2007, which dissolved into street riots and prompted emergency rule. But Hasina's opponents were already alleging widespread vote-rigging and fraud.

Election Commission secretary Humayun Kabir said Hasina's alliance won a two-thirds majority in parliament after votes in most districts had been tallied.

"This has been a very free and fair election," Kabir told reporters at his office in the capital of Dhaka. The commission had some 20,000 observers monitoring the vote.

However, Rizvi Ahmed, a senior official in the party led by former prime minister Khaleda Zia, said it would challenge the result later Tuesday.

Ahmed claimed there were incidents of ballot-rigging and forgery at 220 polling stations, including election officials registering fake votes. He also accused police of pressuring people to vote for Hasina's candidates and said his party has lodged formal complaints with the Election Commission.

Kabir said the commission would investigate the complaints.

Later Tuesday an international observer group said the vote appeared to be fair.

"The (election) process appears to have yielded a result that accurately reflects the will of Bangladeshi voters," said Constance Newman, the head of a 65-person delegation from the International Republican Institute, a Washington-based group that promotes democracy.

Newman said that "political parties, candidates and citizens should accept the results and work together for a peaceful transition of power."

Hasina asked her supporters not to take to the streets to celebrate the victory, fearing potential clashes with rivals.

The voting marks the country's first election in seven years, but with no fresh faces - and with both leading candidates facing corruption charges - many fear the vote will just mean a return to the corruption, mismanagement and paralyzing protests of previous attempts at democracy.

Hasina and Zia are heirs to Bangladeshi political dynasties and fixtures of the political scene. Zia was elected prime minister in 1991, Hasina in 1996, and Zia again in 2001.

Though bitter rivals, their parties campaigned on similar platforms of reducing corruption and controlling inflation. One of the few policy differences is that Hasina's party is seen as relatively secular and liberal, while Zia has allies among Islamic fundamentalists.

Analysts said Hasina's longer absence from power had worked in her favour, together with Zia's poor record in controlling inflation, a key issue.

According to the latest tallies, Kabir said Hasina's alliance won 261 out of the 300 parliamentary seats. Zia's alliance won 30, while independent candidates and the smaller Liberal Democratic Party took four.

Dozens of former ministers in Zia's government lost, including chief of the Islamic fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami party, Motiur Rahman Nizami.

Voter turnout was high, with about 80 per cent of the 81 million eligible voters casting ballots, according to Kabir.

Last year, both Zia and Hasina were jailed on corruption charges, which they dismissed as politically motivated. They were freed on bail and reassumed positions as the heads of their respective parties, the two largest in the country.

Friday, January 9, 2009

Balaka-Attacked

Washington Post

http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=385&sid=1528917

8 Muslims arrested for damaging Dhaka sculpture

November 30, 2008 - 8:51am

By JULHAS ALAM
Associated Press Writer

DHAKA, Bangladesh (AP) - Police in Bangladesh's capital arrested eight members of a hard-line Islamic group for damaging a large outdoor sculpture of a group of white storks, an official said Sunday.

Alam Badshah, a Dhaka Metropolitan Police official, said the men were arrested late Saturday during the attack in Dhaka's Motijheel commercial district. All eight are members of the little-known Muslim group Ulama Anjumane Al Baiyeniat, he said.

Members of the group, which considers sculptures to be a form of idol worship, clashed with security officials who stopped their attack on the statue, he said.

The men, armed with shovels and hammers, damaged the stone base of the 41-foot (12.5-meter) sculpture of six storks after they were unable to pull it down with ropes, Badshah said.

About 100 members of the group gathered nearby and distributed leaflets encouraging action against anti-Islamic activities, he said.

The melee left several people, including some group members, injured. Two of the detainees were being treated at a hospital, Badshah said.

He said the eight faced charges of creating chaos and attacking security officials.

It was unclear why they chose now to attack the statue, which has stood at a road intersection since 1989.

Mrinal Haque, the sculptor, said the statue had nothing to do with Islam.

"It's a shame, it's an attack on our secular culture ... this is a very innocent artwork," he told The Associated Press by phone. "It's like my child."

Some hard-line Islamic groups in Muslim-majority Bangladesh publicly condemn such sculptures. In October, another group damaged a large statue of mystic poet Lalon Shah outside Dhaka's Zia International Airport.


(Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Captive Daughter-An emotion-charged battle




TIME in partnership with CNN

Sunday, Dec. 14, 2008

Bangladesh Court Orders Parents to Free Daughter

(DHAKA, Bangladesh) — A 33-year-old Bangladeshi doctor whose family allegedly held her captive for months at home and in a mental hospital will return to work in Britain after a court in Dhaka ordered her parents to release her Sunday, the woman's lawyer said.

The case of Humayra Abedin stemmed from Britain's new Forced Marriage Act, which took effect last month and gives British courts the power to compel someone to reveal the whereabouts of a person believed to be at risk of being coerced marriage.

The Bangladesh High Court ordered Abedin's parents Sunday to release her and return her passport, said her lawyer Sara Hossain. She will be under the care of the British High Commission in Dhaka until her departure within four days.

"She's free to go. She's been set at liberty and she wants to return to the U.K.," Hossain said. "We're delighted with the result. The rights of a Bangladeshi woman have been protected as they should be."

The Bangladesh authorities honored a British court order under the Forced Marriage Act, although the law is not enforceable in Bangladesh, Hossain said.

Abedin trained as a doctor both in Bangladesh and at Leeds University in northern England and plans to become a family physician in London.

She traveled to Dhaka in August in response to calls that her mother was ill, but following her arrival was confined against her will by her parents, Hossain said.

Abedin sent an e-mail to a friend saying she needed help, lawyer Anne-Marie Hutchinson, who got involved in the case on Hossain's request, earlier told The Associated Press in London.

Hutchinson intervened and the British High Court, unaware of Abedin's whereabouts, issued an order on Dec. 5 under Britain's new Forced Marriage Act asking Abedin's relatives in London to show her to a woman's organization or to the authorities.

Meanwhile, a petition by a local human rights group in Dhaka prompted the Bangladesh High Court earlier this month to order her parents to produce her on Dec. 14 to ascertain her condition, Hossain said.

Hossain said Abedin was held captive at her parents' home in Dhaka, but when lawyers and police wanted to talk to her, she was at a mental hospital in Dhaka and another outside the capital.

In a telephone interview at the time, Abedin's father, Mohammad Joynal Abedin, said she was being treated for mental illness and denied allegations she was held captive to force her into an arranged marriage.

Bangladesh High Court Judge Syed Mahmud Hossain said Sunday after the ruling that he would not reveal Abedin's testimony in the closed-door hearing because it contained "objectionable elements."

"She requested the court not to put her parents in trouble because of what they did to her," the judge said. "But I am saying what you (the parents) have done to her is not acceptable. If there's any further problem, you will be in big trouble."

Abedin has insisted that no charges be filed against her parents, Hossain said.

The Forced Marriage Act gives British courts new powers to issue protection orders that can stop intimidation or violence, prevent someone from having to go abroad, and compel someone to reveal the whereabouts of a person believed to be at risk.

Forced marriages are prevalent between female British citizens of Asian descent and Asian men. Typically, they take place abroad after the woman is told by family that she is traveling to the country to visit relatives.

In the first nine months of 2008, Britain's Forced Marriage Unit handled more than 1,300 cases.

The unit said that nearly 85 percent of the cases had female victims, and the majority involved families of Pakistani, Indian, and Bangladeshi descent. About half involved minors.


Friday, August 29, 2008

Soldiers of Press, and IHL




International Humanitarian Law and press


By Julhas Alam with Samaha M Karim


This is not an irrational question at all: Why does a journalist need to know about law? Being journalists, especially at the time of complexity through which the world is going on, the matter has come to our minds very pertinently. When it comes to the International Humanitarian Law (IHL), a reporter who is interested to cover conflict must have a good idea about the rules of warfare. Why? Because journalists, who are deployed to cover war, are the “soldiers of the press”.

Kent Cooper, General Manager of the New York-based news agency the Associated Press (AP), used the term “soldiers of the press” in 1943 in an address to the AP Board of Directors to pay tribute to all who were then covering the World War II when Hitler stepped out on the road to ruin.

And war is all about chaos, killing, rape, destruction, and, of course, the presence of the “soldiers of the press” on the ground, no matter whatever the causes.

In this modern age of chaos and brutality, understanding the IHL and keeping it in mind under fire is not a luxury.

Being the prime advocate of promoting IHL and spreading knowledge among the journalists, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has put it this way:

"Whether IHL is respected or violated is an important part of the story in contemporary armed conflicts. Violations of the laws are often at the origin of humanitarian and political crises. When combatants break the laws it can affect the success of their mission. It is increasingly likely that alleged war criminals will be prosecuted and it is important to understand the legal background to such proceedings when reporting on them."

"Understanding what certain actions and events mean in IHL terms will generate more quality war reporting. It will help journalists to ask pertinent questions, look at interesting angles, investigate the story behind the story, and feed the debate on the rights and obligations of the different actors in the field and beyond."

"Quality reporting from an IHL angle can make a difference. It can influence policy and decision-making as well as behaviours, i.e., increase the "will" to abide by the law, to fight impunity, to protect civilians."

While IHL mainly focuses on protection of civilians in conflict situations and puts limitations on the means and methods of warfare, it is also important for the journalists on the ground to be aware of dos and don'ts, no matter one is embedded or working independently. It is important because it is related to a war reporter's personal safety: whether he will be treated as a civilian or not during his assignment in a dangerous situation.

In a recent workshop by the ICRC some two dozen journalists from newspapers, news agencies and television channels get that important message: in reporting armed conflicts it is important for the journalists to know the rules of war.

Surinder Singh Oberoi, a former journalist and now the Communication Officer, ICRC, said: Had he known the law, namely the IHL, he would have been able to write better and his contribution would have been far more effective during his days in the profession.

He believes it is of crucial importance that journalists have some knowledge of the law.
For Bangladeshi journalists it was a great experience especially who are currently involved in global news organizations such as the AP. When it comes to broadcast journalism the knowledge of IHL is a must.

This is a brutal reality that people are dying in war across the globe in this 21st century and everything is getting more and more complex. In this South Asian region, conflict is a reality be it Kashmir, war on terror, Talibanism or crisis in Sri Lanka. Conflict in the Chittagong Hill Tracts is a past but civil disturbance can flare up anywhere in Asia or beyond, and Bangladeshi media will need to deploy their own people there for raw details. Bangladeshi media's presence is now very small in the conflict-ridden areas but being part of that to bring news and photos directly from the scene would be a reality soon to satisfy the audience.

The IHL, in layman terms, the rules of war, has become of great significance to those residing in a region of conflict and also those reporting armed conflicts.

In the two-day workshop on “Situation of Armed Violence-Emerging Challenges, Role and Responsibilities of Media” held on August 22-23, 2008 at the BRAC BCDM, Gazipur, Philippe Stoll, Communication Coordinator of the ICRC, explained some of the essential rules of the IHL.

* One being 'limitation', the IHL states that injuring the enemy is not unlimited, there ought to be a limit to the amount of harm inflicted on the enemy/combatants.


* Another rule signifies 'proportionality'. This is basically that the means and methods of warfare must not be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.


* Concerning a major fundamental right - 'humanity' is another rule. This includes freedom from torture, degrading and inhuman behaviours. One may not inflict unnecessary suffering on another. One may not kill an individual who is unarmed or no longer actively involved in the hostilities and civilians.


* Another essential rule of the IHL is 'distinction'. It is important to distinguish between civilians and combatants. Another distinction is required to be made between the military objective and the civilian objects.


* The IHL also provides a framework for 'military necessity'. This allows a proportionate use of force in making an enemy submit, however it does not permit military necessity as an excuse for inhuman conduct and does not justify acts prohibited by the law. The IHL seeks to provide a balance between humanity and military necessity.

The IHL is applicable in two situations, in International armed conflicts and non-international armed conflicts. The Additional Protocol II applies in these circumstances providing protection of civilians.

Article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions prohibits violence against civilians in conflicts “not of an international character” and expands the explicit prohibitions to include forcible displacement (Article 17) as well as “acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population” (Article 13). In recent times observance to the Geneva Conventions is universal.

Humanitarian organizations, as the ICRC, and journalists have certain moral obligations in common. They work as the voice of the victims to the authorities/powers. Persons working in these fields work to promote humanity and protection of the civilian population. In carrying out their tasks the common qualities they must convey are neutrality and impartially.

However, there are certain problems being faced, even though they are neutral, they are becoming the target. In recent times there has been increasing news of journalists being battered and killed. The emblem of the Red Cross used fraudulently in illegal activities hampering the universal neutrality and trust they represent.

The ICRC has showed interests to launch training programme for journalists through practical demonstration in the area of war reporting. That would be a great scope as knowledge about law only cannot equip adequately somebody to work on the ground in a dangerous condition. That can be a step forward for quality journalism, war journalism.


Julhas Alam is Correspondent of the Associated Press (AP), based in Dhaka and Samaha M Karim is working with Law Desk